Cartoon

Opposition in spite of the siege

user preferences

  • Language - en | sp
Online donation system by ClickandPledge

Donations in Euro
Donations in USD

The International Middle East Media Center (IMEMC) is URGENTLY requesting our dear readers to donate in order for IMEMC to continue providing the news.

Click here to donate online via Click & Pledge
Or use the Paypal Donation buttons on the left column

After a petition filed by human rights groups, High Court suspends proceedings in Nil’lin case

author Tuesday August 19, 2008 21:47author by Saed Bannoura - IMEMC News Report this post to the editors

Ashraf Abu Rahma, the Palestinian resident who was shot by the soldiers after they bounded and blindfolded him, filed a petition along with Israeli Human Rights groups; B’Tselem, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, and Yesh Din, against the Judge Advocate General's decision to prosecute the battalion commander, Lt. Col. Omri Borberg, and the soldier who fired the shot, Staff Sgt. L, for “unbecoming conduct”, the High Court issued a decree nisi, forcing the Judge Advocate General to justify his decision, B’Tselem reported.

ashraf_aburahma.jpeg

The court also decided to suspend the military court until a decision is made on the petition.

The petition was written by attorneys Limor Yehuda and Dan Yakir of ACRI. The petitioners demanded the court to change the decision against the soldier due to the severity of the offense he carried out when he shot and wounded the bound detainee.

They stated that this act constitutes an abuse against a detainee in aggravated circumstances, and added that the punishment for such an offense is imprisonment for seven years.  

 “The petitioners strongly condemn the handling of the matter by the Judge Advocate General (JAG), arguing that the light offense chosen indicates a weak response by the JAG's Office: “It transmits to officers and other soldiers an extremely grave message of contempt for human life, and paves the way for future cases. . . It is hard to avoid the conclusion that a systemic defect is involved, one that has spread not only among IDF officers but also among those responsible for enforcing law and order in the army”. B’Tselem reported.

The petitioners said that with its light sentence against the soldier, the military prosecution is setting a dangerous precedent which could lead to similar shootings.

“The petitioners contend that the decision to file a light indictment is unreasonable in the extreme, this also in light of Borberg's senior rank”, B’Tselem added.

 Yet, the decision actually transfers the commander from his position to another role in the corps but he will keep his rank as a lieutenant colonel, and will be able to get promoted in the future as the ruling does not hinder ay future promotion.

The petitioners also said that the Israeli Army Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi showed leniency towards the officer who shot the bound detainee when he said that he “does not see any reason that would prevent the promotion of the commander in the future”, he also said that the commander will return to his position in the army.

The human rights groups said that the officer in question is also suspected of similar attacks and abuse against other detainees, which also could imply that he allowed similar abuse cases against other detainees.

The groups added that although the soldier understood that he was given an order to shoot the bound detainee, he should have used judgment as this order was unethical and illegal.

category west bank | human rights | news report author email saed at imemc dot org

toolbar powered by Conduit
© 2001-2008 IMEMC NEWS. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by IMEMC NEWS. Disclaimer | Privacy | IMEMC Website is powered by Caterized.net